The second characteristic in , i. Examples of these reduplicated objects used by native Bulgarians in real written and oral expression are seen in , and Who sent you, I say? He shaved his head again. This type of seemingly unnecessary overtness also frequently occurs as a speaker repeats all or part of what the preceding speaker has just said, to express either agreement or disagreement with the comment made about an explicitly packaged subject. Among these are Popov 
| Uploader: | Maubei |
| Date Added: | 19 January 2018 |
| File Size: | 43.1 Mb |
| Operating Systems: | Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X |
| Downloads: | 1383 |
| Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
Frank Sinatra - Somethin' Stupid. The least explicit zeros are preferred when possible. Even the brief outline contained in this section, however, may mlinka helpful in putting the more detailed analysis of explicitness which follows into the larger perspective of expression of information structure in Bulgarian overall. The underlined topical DT inwhich is part of the excerpt cited earlier inis representative of the situation in which it is focus which triggers a high degree of explicitness.
Although focus is not the primary factor in the choice between these two overt noun phrase types, and while both the less explicit personal pronouns and the more explicit full noun phrases are compatible with the packaging of both focused and non-focused participants, there is nonetheless a certain correlation between the presence of focus on a participant and an increased likelihood of the higher of these two degrees of explicitness.
First, however, Section 1. Tja stana e taka.
Steam Community :: Mishkata na pakta e trash
They are packaged as zero subjects in the early parts of this excerpt. Sean Paul - Baby Boy.
I have underlined clause-level topics, put discourselevel themes in boldface, and have numbered the subjects for convenience of discussion. Expansion Union - Playing With Lightning. Everything is quite typical.
ansina [licensed for non-commercial use only] / Ethiopia has castles
Haddaway - I Miss You. Zanesi gi na Malinka. In each of the situations listed in Table 5, a feature of the context contributes to a potential ambiguity or misperception of aboutness for the participant in question, and each promotes a more explicit form than what might be expected based on the factors discussed thus far.
Even in those instances in which emphasis is placed on the object, a long form pronoun LPP would have been possible, as we will see in the next section.
Chingy - Hood Star - Dem Jeans f. We used to think when we get to 30 and are too old for the track, now we do the marathon, Makke said.
Fun Factory - Close To You. A great deal has been written on these topics, and it would be impractical if not impossible to provide here an exhaustive survey. The fragments in are illustrative. As soon as she comes through the door she starts talking to me.
This feature, as will be seen in Chapters Two and Three, plays an important part in determining noun phrase type in the packaging of participants. Mene djadkata vze da mi dopada.
Nai Gotinite Momi4eta 110ou
Vri i kipi tam. Malunka in Type 1, the focused subject is being contrasted with another participant. We then see a mid-paragraph switch where the woman becomes the DT as the writer gives information about her as a child, as portrayed in an old photograph which had fallen out of a blanket on her lap.
It is quite possible that a could be uttered with no focused elements whatsoever. For another example of this stacking up of features causing or favoring explicitness, see Everybody messes with it. Ami, po-razumno e taka. The unnamed performer of the action is understood to be human, and may be singular or plural. What even these seemingly exceptional forms in the minority have in common with those in the majority is that they represent what is being spoken or written about at the clause level.
A three-part statement which captures the essence of this connection is this: And Katie, what does her father do? References to the DT are underlined, and each clause-level topic sladarnica in italics. The two topics that are not currently discourse themes, the milk and the pot, are italicized, but not underlined.
Comments
Post a Comment